Skip to the form

Suggest an addition

Propose a change to the map

Every arrow on the map records one narrow claim with a source someone else can check. A useful suggestion does the same: it names the works, states exactly what you think the record should say, and points to evidence.

Nothing is added automatically. I review each suggestion for scope, wording, source, evidence status and date basis before it appears in a new data version. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.

What are you suggesting?

The works involved

An arrow runs from the earlier, acknowledged precursor to the later work. If a work is already on the map, choose it from the list as you type.

Check the inclusion criteria in Method and scope first. A shared mechanic or theme is not enough on its own.

Earlier work (the precursor)

Later work

Why does it belong on the map? Tick all that apply.

What needs correcting?

The claim

Your source

The best source is one where the designer or publisher states the connection themselves: a credits page, a designer's note, an interview, a rulebook acknowledgement. Map layout, resemblance or a forum guess cannot support an arrow on their own.

About you (optional)

This page does not save or send anything. It prepares your suggestion so that you can email it. I use your name and email address only to reply and, if you tick the box, to credit you.